In many higher education organizations throughout the world, they use a system that is four-point evaluating pupils’ knowledge, skills and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.
Knowing the meaning of points
The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who has got discovered comprehensive, systematic and knowledge that is deep the capability to individually perform the tasks given by this system, acquainted with the key and additional literature, suggested by this system. Such an evaluation also involves the mastering associated with the relationship between your fundamental principles of control and their significance when it comes to acquired occupation.
The evaluation “good” puts the student who has got mastered the educational and system product in full, successfully fulfills the program’s tasks, worked out the primary literary works recommended by this system. That is, students who has got shown the systematic nature of discipline knowledge and is effective at self-replenishment and upgrading along the way of further educational work and professional task.
The grades “satisfactory” deserve a student who may have discovered the ability regarding the basic educational material to the degree required for further training and future work with an occupation, effective at performing the tasks given to because of the program, knowledgeable about the main literature suggested by this program. As being a guideline, site that writes essays for you this evaluation is presented to pupils who possess made flaws into the response to the exam as well as in the performance of this exam projects, but have demonstrated the capacity to expel them.
The evaluation is “unsatisfactory” for the student who may have understanding of gaps which have resulted in fundamental mistakes into the implementation of the tasks given to by the program, this is certainly, a student that is struggling to continue training or start expert activities after graduation without extra trained in the discipline that is relevant.
Shortcomings of four-point assessment rating and system system
A system that is four-way assessing students’ knowledge, skills and abilities calls for significant improvement or replacement. Its primary disadvantages are: insufficient inspiration when it comes to persistence of educational and cognitive task, given that it is targeted on acquiring no less than knowledge (“made up” – “did not make up”); created for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity within the evaluation of student’s knowledge; inconsistency with all the school system, which students used as previous pupils, etc.
The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students’ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments serves as a quantitative indicator regarding the quality of educational and intellectual activity of this student when compared with the successes of their other students.
The rating system for evaluating students’ knowledge, skills and abilities is dependant on the principles that are following
- each discipline that is academic the pupil’s work with its mastering is evaluated when you look at the credit devices, the quantity of that is determined by the score;
- the record associated with the pupil’s current work must certanly be kept, that is reflected when you look at the evaluation that is finalin the units of credits);
- the peculiarities of teaching different topics (complexity, need for control into the curriculum) are taken into account, that is, the complexity element (significance);
- option of several types of control (outgoing, present, intermediate, final);
The pupil score for the semester or 12 months is defined as the arithmetic that is average of rating for every control.
To make usage of a rating system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, specific conditions are essential: the readiness of instructors and pupils to perceive them; appropriate organizational and support that is methodological in particular, independent work of students is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting by means of unique tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.